Date: Sat, 16 Aug 97 08:18:44 EDT From: Snuffles@kew.com Subject: UUPC-Info-Request Digest 1997 #15 To: uupc-info-digest@kew.com Message-ID: Reply-To: UUPC-Info-Request@kew.com UUPC-Info-Request Digest Sat, 16 Aug 97 Volume 1997: Issue 15 Today's Topics: 1.12 possible bug (4 msgs) Alternate SIG file (2 msgs) A question banning of earthlink.net from kew.com Dupes (4 msgs) intermittent errors with ki-info, uupc-info mail4u configuration mailing lists moved more anti-SPAM hacks at kew.com newsrun No junk (2 msgs) passive FTP downloads Pseudo-domain RAS with uupc/extended (2 msgs) Rmail and envelopes from SMTP-UUCP relay VMS Request: Subscription Info Part 01/01 To subscribe to UUPC-Info-Digest, send the command in the body of a message to listserv@kew.com: subscribe uupc-info-Digest To signoff from UUPC-Info-Digest, use "signoff" instead of "subscribe". You can also send an "index" to the listserv to get an index of back issues and other files available for retrieval. Note: Questions on UUPC/extended itself which are not of general interest should be sent to help@kew.com, not to the mailing list. Nor questions should be posted on Usenet, we don't read it. (Much.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 03 Jul 1997 23:37:36 +0000 From: Eric Veldhuyzen Subject: 1.12 possible bug To: "Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/Extended Support" "Drew Derbyshire writes: > On Wed, 02 Jul 1997 20:53:17 +0000, "Eric Veldhuyzen" > wrote: >> >> For the record, I also noticed that the rnews that comes with >> changi is quite a bit different. The main difference is that has a >> different format for the active file. UUPC/Extended rnews has the >> entries like >> >> group low high mode >> >> while Changi (and all the other News systems I know of) use >> >> group high low mode >> >> In other words, they are incompatible... > Odd, I thought I fixed that years ago. it's easy to change and then > repair (run genhist after fixing the code.) I'll add it to the bug > list. Might be, I am not sure if it still exists in the current version since I don't use it yet. I'd like to have some documentation about it first. Anyway, this behavior was in 1.12b, and I think it was also in 1.12r. I switched to changi after that, so I don't know about 1.12s or later. I only noticed this by accident, trn couldn't (for OS/2, UUPC version) understand my active file a few days after I switched to using changi. It also possible that the only reason that it couldn't understand it was that some entries were "low high", while others were reversed... So, if you fix it (which seems a good iea to me), please make it very clear that you fixed it, since it might break some programs that use the active file of UUPC...... -- #!perl5 # Eric Veldhuyzen eric@terra.xs4all.nl # Moderator of Comp.os.os2.moderated PGP-KeyID: 0xFB64FCB3 $!=$;=$_+(++$_);($:,$~,$/,$^,$*,$@)=$!=~ # Perl is Fun! /.(.)...(.)(.)....(.)..(.)..(.)/;`$^$~$/$: $^$*$@$~ $_>&$;` # TEAM OS/2 ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 02 Jul 1997 23:44:14 -0500 From: "Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/Extended Support" Subject: 1.12 possible bug To: "Eric Veldhuyzen" On Wed, 02 Jul 1997 20:53:17 +0000, "Eric Veldhuyzen" wrote: > "Drew Derbyshire writes: > > > On Thu, 26 Jun 97 01:03:41 +0100, > > "=?iso-8859-1?q?K.-P._Kirchd=F6rfer?=" > > wrote: > >> On Fri, 13 Jun 1997 20:50:45 -0500, Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/Extended > >> Support wrote: > >> > >>>> A last question, I use the changi nntp-server from Harald > >>>> Kipp. He wrote some support for interfacing between changi and > >>>> UUPC/extended, especially a modified rnews and expire. Did he > >>>> sent you source code, or in other words does UUPC/extended rnews > >>>> 1.12s and expire work together with changi, or do I have to use > >>>> the old stuff from Harald Kipp? > >>>I have applied no changes from Harald. > >> > >> Do you intend to? Do you even have the code? Is it to hard to > >> apply? > > > I'm not sure I have it, once things settle down, I'll certainly > > consider it. (if it's the bad stdin code, yes, it may be applied.) > > For the record, I also noticed that the rnews that comes with changi > is quite a bit different. The main difference is that has a different > format for the active file. UUPC/Extended rnews has the entries like > > group low high mode > > while Changi (and all the other News systems I know of) use > > group high low mode > > In other words, they are incompatible... Odd, I thought I fixed that years ago. it's easy to change and then repair (run genhist after fixing the code.) I'll add it to the bug list. -- Drew Derbyshire UUPC/extended e-mail: software@kew.com Telephone: 617-279-9712 Windows NT is Top View that knows somebody ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 01 Jul 1997 23:43:50 -0500 From: "Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/Extended Support" Subject: 1.12 possible bug To: "=?iso-8859-1?q?K.-P.__Kirchd=F6rfer?=" On Thu, 26 Jun 97 01:03:41 +0100, "=?iso-8859-1?q?K.-P._Kirchd=F6rfer?=" wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jun 1997 20:50:45 -0500, Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/Extended > Support wrote: > > >> A last question, I use the changi nntp-server from Harald Kipp. He > >> wrote some support for interfacing between changi and UUPC/extended, > >> especially a modified rnews and expire. Did he sent you source code, > >> or in other words does UUPC/extended rnews 1.12s and expire work > >> together with changi, or do I have to use the old stuff from Harald > >> Kipp? > > > >I have applied no changes from Harald. > > Do you intend to? Do you even have the code? Is it to hard to apply? I'm not sure I have it, once things settle down, I'll certainly consider it. (if it's the bad stdin code, yes, it may be applied.) I also need to apply the mail folders code for Pegasus ... just different things on the queue ... -- Drew Derbyshire UUPC/extended e-mail: software@kew.com Telephone: 617-279-9712 "Your dreams are china in your hand . . ." - T'pau ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 4 Jul 1997 16:51:50 +1200 From: stephen@digitech.co.nz Subject: 1.12 possible bug To: "UUPC Mailing List" ** Reply to note from Eric Veldhuyzen Thu, 03 Jul 1997 23:37:36 +0000 > > "Drew Derbyshire writes: > > On Wed, 02 Jul 1997 20:53:17 +0000, "Eric Veldhuyzen" > > wrote: > >> > >> For the record, I also noticed that the rnews that comes with > >> changi is quite a bit different. The main difference is that has a > >> different format for the active file. UUPC/Extended rnews has the > >> entries like > >> > >> group low high mode > >> > >> while Changi (and all the other News systems I know of) use > >> > >> group high low mode > >> > >> In other words, they are incompatible... > > > Odd, I thought I fixed that years ago. it's easy to change and then > > repair (run genhist after fixing the code.) I'll add it to the bug > > list. > > Might be, I am not sure if it still exists in the current version > since I don't use it yet. I'd like to have some documentation about it > first. Anyway, this behavior was in 1.12b, and I think it was also in > 1.12r. I switched to changi after that, so I don't know about 1.12s or > later. I only noticed this by accident, trn couldn't (for OS/2, UUPC > version) understand my active file a few days after I switched to > using changi. It also possible that the only reason that it couldn't > understand it was that some entries were "low high", while others were > reversed... I have been running Changi for OS/2 with UUPC 1.12r and now 1.12s and trn works fine with both Changi and the UUPC news databases (I run both in parallel). They both use the same correct active file format. And I have never had to change that format since I started running UUPC news (with 1.12k I believe), so I think it must have been fixed between 1.12b and 1.12k. -- Stephen Worthington Telephone: +64-4-569-6764 (home) Digi-Tech Communications Ltd +64-4-389-8909 (work) stephen@digitech.co.nz (work) Fax: +64-4-389-9901 (work) stephen@inisant.actrix.gen.nz (home) http://www.digitech.co.nz ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 01 Aug 1997 21:53:45 -0600 From: "Walter Medak" Subject: Alternate SIG file To: uupc-info@kew.com I'm just wondering where I would put the command to insert an alternate SIG file when sending email? The docs for 1.12b mention ~A, while the userid.RC that came with 1.12p mentions ~S to do the alt sig thing. Which is the proper command? Any info would be appreciated. -- Remove the "-sansspam" to reply directly ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 06 Aug 1997 23:00:52 -0500 From: "Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/Extended Support" Subject: Alternate SIG file To: "Walter Medak" On Fri, 01 Aug 1997 21:53:45 -0600, "Walter Medak" wrote: > I'm just wondering where I would put the command to insert an > alternate SIG file when sending email? The docs for 1.12b mention ~A, > while the userid.RC that came with 1.12p mentions ~S to do the alt sig > thing. Which is the proper command? Either. From the configuration table in configur.c: {"altsignature", &E_altsignature, B_MUA, B_TOKEN }, {"signature", &E_signature, B_NEWS|B_MUA, B_TOKEN }, ~s reads signature, and ~a reads the alternative. > > Any info would be appreciated. > -- > Remove the "-sansspam" to reply directly For uninformed users, we (kew.com) bounce mail with bad sender addresses. -- Drew Derbyshire UUPC/extended e-mail: software@kew.com Telephone: 617-279-9812 This space for rent. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 06 Jul 1997 10:34:29 -0600 From: "Walter Medak" Subject: A question To: "UUPC/Extended mailing list" In the last couple of weeks, my UUCP feed had some problems with email, causing none to flow at all. Now, every so often, I get email from some one, which arrives correctly, but doesn't get put into my mailbox. The only reason I can think of is that because the domain is different from my real domain. Would putting the "wrong" domain into the HOSTPATH file with the "proper" nodename fo my site rectify the problem? -- I'm always doing what I can't do yet in order to learn how to do it. - Vincent van Gogh Email: ghoti@lao-tse.lcrnet.org WWW: http://www.freenet.edmonton.ab.ca/~ghoti ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Aug 1997 21:41:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Drew Derbyshire Subject: banning of earthlink.net from kew.com To: hostmaster@EARTHLINK.NET After multiple complains to earthlink and the threat of banning all mail from earthlink, Kendra Electronic Wonderworks was promised in May that earthlink would stop forwarding SPAM from third parties. However, the following messages reported in our mail log, including the obviously forged ones from fully numeric domains, were blissfully forwarded by earthlink and rejected by our own curstom filter: Aug 3 13:59:41 pandora sendmail[856]: smtpSPAMFilter: Rejection <1234@aol.com> via iceland.it.earthlink.net: 571 We do not accept mail from completely numeric user ids Aug 1 03:10:25 pandora sendmail[1486]: smtpSPAMFilter: Rejection <23845436@aol.com> via norway.it.earthlink.net: 571 We do not accept mail from completely numeric user ids Aug 1 06:38:02 pandora sendmail[2688]: smtpSPAMFilter: Rejection <64236028@13963.com> via denmark.it.earthlink.net: 571 We do not accept mail from completely numeric user ids Aug 1 06:47:08 pandora sendmail[2696]: smtpSPAMFilter: Rejection <64236028@13963.com> via hungary.it.earthlink.net: 571 We do not accept mail from completely numeric user ids Aug 1 06:50:00 pandora sendmail[2698]: smtpSPAMFilter: Rejection <64236028@13963.com> via hungary.it.earthlink.net: 571 We do not accept mail from completely numeric user ids Jul 27 15:52:56 pandora sendmail[4534]: smtpSPAMFilter: Rejection via holland.it.earthlink.net: 571 We only accept mail from this relay sent by addresses within its domain Clearly, earthlink is making no serious effort to stop SPAM as the most basic sendmail filter from www.sendmail.org would catch the unregistered domains from being accepted inbound by your mail relays. (Why aren't you running them?) In addition, we are now seeing new SPAM originating from earthlink (now sent from the postmaster reserved address <> and from earthlink addresses such as kditeman@earthlink.net). Given that our SPAM filter cannot catch these new SPAMs and you seem unwilling to work on even basic SPAM problems, we seen no reason not to ban ALL mail originating from your site. This warning is your sole chance to respond as to how you intend to correct this. If we do not see improvement by the end of the week, we will delete all your users from our mailing lists ban your site on 9 August 1997. Of course, since we have nothing against your users, we suggest switch to another ISP, in particular one which fights SPAM. -ahd- -- Drew Derbyshire, Hostmaster Internet: ahd@kew.com Kendra Electronic Wonderworks Telephone: 617-279-9812 "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes." - Jackson ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 05 Aug 1997 05:36:22 -0600 From: "Walter Medak" Subject: Dupes To: uupc-info@kew.com Is it just me, or are there dupes on a regular basis happening with the mailing list? Regular, as in every message. -- Remove the nospam. to reply directly ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 06 Aug 1997 22:56:28 -0500 From: "Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/Extended Support" Subject: Dupes To: "Walter Medak" On Tue, 05 Aug 1997 05:36:22 -0600, "Walter Medak" wrote: > Is it just me, or are there dupes on a regular basis happening with > the mailing list? Regular, as in every message. > -- > Remove the nospam. to reply directly I'm only seeing one copy of the messages. See if the messages have the SAME Received: lines all the way through, often if a system is screwed up check pointing it will duplicate on a stalled delivery. -- Drew Derbyshire UUPC/extended e-mail: software@kew.com Telephone: 617-279-9812 This space for rent. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 06 Aug 1997 21:33:39 -0600 From: "Walter Medak" Subject: Dupes To: "Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/Extended Support" On Wed, 06 Aug 1997 22:56:28 -0500, "Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/Extended Support" wrote: > On Tue, 05 Aug 1997 05:36:22 -0600, "Walter Medak" wrote: > > Is it just me, or are there dupes on a regular basis happening with > > the mailing list? Regular, as in every message. > > I'm only seeing one copy of the messages. See if the messages have the > SAME Received: lines all the way through, often if a system is screwed > up check pointing it will duplicate on a stalled delivery. It seems to have cleared up, as I'm only seeing one copy now. I did nothing other than alter the Domain/FromDomain settings to try to eliminate junk email. Any other email coming to this system was just fine. -- Remove the nospam. to reply directly ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 07 Aug 1997 17:20:35 -0600 From: "Walter Medak" Subject: Dupes To: "Chuck Cole" On Thu, 7 Aug 1997 10:20:50 -0500, "Chuck Cole" wrote: > FYI - Your "nospam" doesn't come through in any way that would slow down > spam here. In email, no. I have it set to show only in newsgroups, where most of the spamsters seem to get addresses from. -- Remove the nospam. to reply directly ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 01:27:46 -0500 From: "Snuffles P. Bear" Subject: intermittent errors with ki-info, uupc-info To: ki-info@kew.com, uupc-info@kew.com We have had minor problems with the first message after a list update (new subscription or signoff) not getting posted properly. If you see such a problem, please repost and report the problem to me. -- Your faithful furry servant, Ice Cream Money: PO Box 80144 Snuffles P. Bear Stoneham, MA 02180 Internet: snuffles@kew.com Give! Support the Wonderworks Tosci's Chocolate Ice Cream Fund! ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 27 Jul 1997 10:13:00 MYT+8 From: yvonne@egroup.po.my (Yvonne Russell) Subject: mail4u configuration To: uupc-info@kew.com Hi, I know this isn't the right forum for this question, but I don't know where else to post. I read about using mail4u on this list, have tried it but am experiencing a problem with outgoing mail (the uupc/extended part is working fine). My messages to mail4u-info@mail4u.home.at and eauth@mail4u.home.at are bouncing. Can anyone help me? Yvonne. Yvonne Russell CMY Systems Sdn Bhd, Member of Econsult Group of Companies 28 Jalan Jati 3/6 Shah Alam, 40000 Selangor Malaysia Tel: +60 3 559 4616 Fax: +60 3 550 4249 E-Mail: yvonne@egroup.po.my New Web URL: http://www.cmysys.com/info/ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 01 Jul 1997 22:26:56 -0500 From: "Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/Extended Support" Subject: mailing lists moved To: uupc-info@kew.com, ki-info@kew.com Once again, I've moved the mailing lists. :-) No changes should be visible, especially if this posts gets out. (We're now running the 300 kilobit/second uplink in production, which doesn't help mail through put much due to the latency of mail servers, but it allows a moderate mail load to run at any time without impacting downloads, etc.) -- Drew Derbyshire UUPC/extended e-mail: software@kew.com Telephone: 617-279-9712 Everyone can be taught to sculpt: Michelangelo would have had to be taught how not to. So it is with the great programmers. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 22:38:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Drew Derbyshire Subject: more anti-SPAM hacks at kew.com To: ki-info@pandora.hh.kew.com, uupc-info@pandora.hh.kew.com I have now made my first (and hopefully last) source code patch to sendmail, the mailer used by the kew.com gateway. First, this change will cause mail labeled as being from any of a known list of larger sites on the net which was NOT sent from a relay on that site to bounce. For example, sending us mail with a from address of ahd@compuserve.com will fail if not received from a compuserve.com host or our own published mail forwarders. Second, this change will ONLY allow the system on my list of untrusted domains to only send mail for themselves; all mail sent from an earthlink.net system, for example, MUST have a return address of earthlink.net or it will bounce. This will hopefully allow me to avoid banning such sites as juno.com and earthlink.net from our mailing lists. This should not affect normal users of our mailing lists and others sending legit mail from these sites. If you attempt to send legit mail and it gets bounced by our system please call me at the listed number below. -ahd- -- Drew Derbyshire Internet: ahd@kew.com Kendra Electronic Wonderworks Telephone: 617-279-9812 "I get by with a little help from my friends . . ." - Lennon/McCartney ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 01 Jul 1997 23:42:11 -0500 From: "Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/Extended Support" Subject: newsrun To: "Udo van den Heuvel" On 29 Jun 97 14:52:45 +0100, "Udo van den Heuvel" wrote: > The 1.12p newsrun works OK without crashing (unlike the 1.12s newsrun). > Maybe this info helps? (I see your later note that 1.12p can also crash.) Well, wqhat I mostly need to do is get the newest systems up running news and watch it flame out here locally. I just put UUCP on the new gateway when I moved the mailing lists earlier this evening, but didn't (yet) define the feed to the UUPC/extended box. Basically, the latest migration of hardware has taken the past ~ 3 weeks, once I get it done (another week?) and the SMTP server down (2-3 weeks after that?) I'll look at the assembled piule of bugs. -ahd- -- Drew Derbyshire UUPC/extended e-mail: software@kew.com Telephone: 617-279-9712 "Your dreams are china in your hand . . ." - T'pau ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 29 Jul 97 8:22:36 +0200 From: Peter Gahbler Subject: No junk To: uupc-info@kew.com (UUPC Mailing List) Hi, I must have changed something but I don't know what. For some time I haven't looked at junk. But now I would like to control which news are junked so I can adjust my active file and/or tell my feed which newsgroups to omit. Junk is in my active file. The directory exists. Nevertheless nothing shows up in junk although I have log entries about undeliverable articles (but 0 junked articles). Where should I look for the problem? Bye Peter ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 06 Aug 1997 23:02:32 -0500 From: "Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/Extended Support" Subject: No junk To: "Peter Gahbler" On Tue, 29 Jul 97 8:22:36 +0200, "Peter Gahbler" wrote: > I must have changed something but I don't know what. For some > time I haven't looked at junk. But now I would like to control > which news are junked so I can adjust my active file and/or tell > my feed which newsgroups to omit. Junk is in my active file. The > directory exists. Nevertheless nothing shows up in junk although > I have log entries about undeliverable articles (but 0 junked > articles). Where should I look for the problem? 'junk', not 'Junk', perhaps? Which version? There were bugs around ~ 1.12p/1.12r in this regard. -- Drew Derbyshire UUPC/extended e-mail: software@kew.com Telephone: 617-279-9812 This space for rent. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 09 Jul 1997 20:39:01 -0500 From: "Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/Extended Support" Subject: passive FTP downloads To: "UUPC Mailing List" Passive FTP downloads were not working from ftp.kew.com for the past couple of weeks, which could have caused problems for both FTP and Web browsers. This now been corrected. -- Drew Derbyshire UUPC/extended e-mail: software@kew.com Telephone: 617-279-9812 "One small bug for man, one great program for mankind." - N. Armstrong ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 17:10:07 -0600 From: "Walter Medak" Subject: Pseudo-domain To: upc@lao-tse.lcrnet.org I've tried doing the Domain/FromDomain thing to use a "phony" domain to try to eliminate some of the junk email that I get. What I did was add a few characters to my address. It works just fine for email but not at all for Usenet. Did I miss something someplace along the line? -- I'm always doing what I can't do yet in order to learn how to do it. - Vincent van Gogh Email: ghoti@lao-tse.lcrnet.org WWW: http://www.freenet.edmonton.ab.ca/~ghoti ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 2 Aug 1997 12:01:49 MYT+8 From: yvonne@egroup.po.my (Yvonne Russell) Subject: RAS with uupc/extended To: uupc-info@kew.com Hi, On NT is it possible to have RAS running with uupc/extended on the same serial port? I can only get uupc to dial if the RAS is shut down otherwise it monopolises the port. Thanks, Yvonne. Yvonne Russell CMY Systems Sdn Bhd, Member of Econsult Group of Companies 28 Jalan Jati 3/6 Shah Alam, 40000 Selangor Malaysia Tel: +60 3 559 4616 Fax: +60 3 550 4249 E-Mail: yvonne@egroup.po.my New Web URL: http://www.cmysys.com/info/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 06 Aug 1997 23:01:29 -0500 From: "Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/Extended Support" Subject: RAS with uupc/extended To: yvonne@egroup.po.my On Sat, 2 Aug 1997 12:01:49 MYT+8, "Yvonne Russell" wrote: > On NT is it possible to have RAS running with uupc/extended on the > same serial port? I can only get uupc to dial if the RAS is shut down > otherwise it monopolises the port. Not until I get the TAPI version integrated. Anyone know if it works then? -- Drew Derbyshire UUPC/extended e-mail: software@kew.com Telephone: 617-279-9812 This space for rent. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 06 Jul 1997 19:36:47 -0500 From: "Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/Extended Support" Subject: Rmail and envelopes from SMTP-UUCP relay To: hajo@Zierke.com On Sat, 05 Jul 97 13:22:45 +0200, "Hans-Joachim Zierke" wrote: > this site is suffering from problems with bounces and return receipts. All > these messages will reach my providers postmaster, and he is not that happy > about it. The problem is this one: > > From minden!Christoph_Dross@compuserve.com Sat Jul 5 04:52:14 1997 remote > from quijote Received: from minden by quijote.Huellhorst.Zierke.com > (UUPC/extended 1.12s) with UUCP ------------------- > U uucp quijote > R Christoph_Dross@minden > F D.quijote00cMr > I D.quijote00cMr > C rmail postmaster > # Generated on quijote by UUPC/extended 1.12s (built on May 18 1997 > 12:28:13) # at Sat, 05 Jul 1997 04:52:14 +0200 > # Call file C.panchoC0cM > # Execute file D.quijote00cMd D.quijote00cMr > # Data file D.quijote00cMe X.quijote00cMr > ---------------- > > > rmail rewrites > minden!Christoph_Dross@compuserve.com > to > Christoph_Dross@minden Okay, was the original requester Christoph_Dross@compuserve.com? I just rewrote this for sendmail's RMAIL on UNIX, my own RMAIL is next in queue, along with the SMTP server, SMTP client (which has a similar problem with return addresses because of the bad parameters, and the news blowing chow. (I just got the UUCP side of our news back up, after several weeks completely dead.) -- Drew Derbyshire UUPC/extended e-mail: software@kew.com Telephone: 617-279-9812 "Phasors locked on target, Captain." ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 19 Jul 1997 10:15:31 -0800 From: Listserv@kew.com Subject: VMS Request: Subscription Info Part 01/01 To: digest-local@listserv.kew.com -- Welcome to the UUPC-Info mailing list. This list is for parties interested in UUPC/extended for DOS, OS/2, and Windows/NT, and replaces the list of the same name on sun.soe.clarkson.edu. Please send all submissions to the list to uupc-info@kew.com. You may leave the list at any time by sending a "SIGNOFF uupc-info" command to Listserv@kew.com. Please note that this command must NOT be sent to the list address (uupc-info@kew.com), but to the mail server which handles this mailing list. The amount of acknowledgement you wish to receive from this list after submitting an e-mail can be changed using the "ECHOMAIL uupc-info" and "NOECHOMAIL uupc-info" commands. The ECHOMAIL command forces the mailing list to send a copy of the mail back to you. The NOECHOMAIL command turns this off. The default upon joining this list is ECHOMAIL. The automated list and file server functions are supported by the V-Mail Server for DOS from Vandenburg Systems Reasearch. The mailer, of course, is UUPC/extended for OS/2. More information on V-MailServer commands can be found in the "V-MailServer HELP", which you can retrieve by sending a "HELP" command to Listserv@kew.com. You can also retrieve files (including UUPC/extended binaries and source) and the V-Mailserver binaries); send the command INDEX to Listserv@kew.com for a complete list of files. -- Kendra Electronic Wonderworks ------------------------------ End of UUPC-Info-Request Digest ******************************